Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, only significant coverage appears to be from e-magazines. Much of the content appears to be promotional. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:03, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the current article is still questionable for the applicable notability at best. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not seem notable. Couldn't find substantial coverage (admittedly only did a 5 min search).-- Elmidae (talk) 17:30, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.